Transform Your Organization with Facilitative Leadership

by Glenn Brome


So, facilitative leadership: is leading by committee ... not!It is not about getting everyone together and asking, "what do you and you think?" Everything cannot be decided via committee! Especially if your work involves things like law enforcement or the military. The front lines are not the place to take a 'straw poll'. Even as I say this, and even in those aforementioned operations, there are times when a leader can, and should get people together to talk about how to improve the operation; by genuinely asking for input from all levels. That is what facilitative leadership is about.For this process to work, the leader must be successful at creating an atmosphere where people not only feel comfortable contributing ideas and suggestions, but where the leader actually acts on that input.Acting on input does not mean doing everything the group tells you to do. It does mean making it clear to the group that their input is valued by defining how that input will be used. Many times a leader will give the impression that if the team members give honest input, they will be given their 'marching orders'. This is why the leader must clarify prior to asking for input how that input will be used. For instance, let the group know if you are: 1- Just asking for ideas and you (the leader) will make the final decision2- Asking for ideas and you (the leader) will discuss options with the group again prior to making the final decision.3- Requesting input so final decision will be made together as a team4- Requiring input and the team will make the final decision after reviewing it with you.5- Giving input to the team and the team will tell you what the final decision is.These are just examples of how to explain your intentions when involving direct reports in the decision-making process. The added advantage of this clarity is that it is another critical step in building respect, trust and rapport.This model is the strategic outgrowth of the changing role of leadership.Back in the day, and hopefully this does not mean last week for you ... the leader stood in the middle of everything and directed the team with one-way communication. Essentially that leader would say, "jump" and the followers would need to know how high. As this leader progresses she/he allows for two-way communication, but the leader is still in the middle directing the activities of the group.Continuing this progression, the leader steps out of the middle - and becomes a part of the team. This also allows for better communication - actually between team members. The leader is still responsible but does not 'push' her/his people, they tend to 'pull', to get people to follow them - not to push and micro-manage them.As the leader progresses even further, they can actually step away from the day-to-day aspects of the area. This affords even more communication between the members of the team. Again, you cannot do this until you have helped the team members interact with each other on a 'level playing field'. This is why you should be familiar with the elements in this book that can help you build those essential skills for your subordinates - so you can be free to work on the more strategic elements of your job, instead of the tactical.The skill required for this process is critical because the typical leader's area of span and control is not retracting, it's expanding! So you will be required to 'run' multiple departments, and that cannot be done effectively if you are 'stuck' in the middle of one trying to direct everything. Now, keep in mind, when you step away do not disengage! Because you 'cannot expect what you don't inspect'. So, as you have allowed for the skills of your teams to be sufficient enough for you to 'step away' - you must be accessible and continue to coach and hold everyone accountable.Facilitative leaders also have courage. This starts when we are very young ... A six-year old and a four-year old are upstairs in their bedroom. "I think it's about time we started cussing" the four-year old nods his head in approval. The six-year old continues. "when we go downstairs for breakfast I'm gonna say "hell", and you say "ass", "ok!" The four-year old agrees with enthusiasm. Their mother walks into the kitchen and asks the six-year old what he wants for breakfast. "Aw hell, mom, I guess I'll have some cheerios." Whack! He flies out of his chair, tumbles across the kitchen floor, gets up, and runs upstairs crying his eyes out, with his mother in hot pursuit, slapping his rear every step. The mom locks him in his room and shouts, "you can just stay there till I let you out!" She then comes back downstairs, looks at the four-year old, and asks with a stern voice, "and what do you want for breakfast young man?" I don't know," he blubbers, "but you can bet your ass it won't be cheerios." -origin unknownCourage is exemplified by that leader that has the ability to not fold under pressure. Take this situation; you have been coaching a direct report on leading an important project. 'fast forward': the project does not reach its target. Your boss calls you in an asks, "what the h_ _ _ happened?!" Most people in that situation would start to explain about how they have been coaching a member of their team, blah. Blah, blah ... wrong answer! A facilitative leader would have the courage to say something like, "I am responsible, and I will make sure, that doesn't happen again..." now that takes courage. You don't 'turn the person in' to the boss. You are ultimately responsible for your group's output, so act like it! Now, you do have some conversations with that direct report about what happened. Clearly there were some miscues during the 'coaching' process that need to be revisited. Keep in mind, during these 'discussions' that it is and was a two-way street. It is the employee's responsibility to accomplish the goals and it is your responsibility to be sure your people are on-track. Another essential ability a facilitative leader possesses is their capacity to 'take counsel'. They have the ability to listen to multiple points of view, including those who typically do not agree with them. This is a powerful trait because you tend to have more complete input, thus making better decisions. To do this, a leader must be able to capture the key kernels of information. They have to be able to maintain bridges between people and create an atmosphere where people share information with each other - largely because they have earned respect, even from people who usually do not see things the same way. When one has mastered these skills they are recognized as a facilitative leader.(c) 2006, Glenn Brome. Reprint rights granted to all publishers so long as the article and by-line are kept intact and all links are made live.
Article Source: http://www.leadershiparticles.net
This excerpt of the book "Facilitative Leadership" is provided by Glenn Brome. Glenn is a leadership expert, professional speaker and author who pulls from his solid background as a leader in motivating people to achieve superior results. To purchase the book "Facilitative Leadership" or to book Glenn as a speaker visit www.GlennBrome.com

Introduction to Business Ethics

Is it possible for an individual with strong moral values to make ethically questionable decisions in a business setting? What affects a person's inclination to make either ethical or unethical decisions in a business organization? Although the answers to that question are not entirely clear, there appear to be three general sets of factors that influence the standards of behavior in an organization; individual factors, social factors and opportunity.Several individual factors influence the level of ethical behavior in an organization. An individual's knowledge level regarding an issue can help to determine ethical behavior. A decision maker with a greater amount of knowledge regarding an object or situation may take steps to avoid ethical problems, whereas a less-informed person may unknowingly take action that leads to an ethical conflict. One's moral values and central, value-related attitudes clearly influence his or her business behavior. Most people join organizations to accomplish personal goals. The types of personal goals an individual aspires to and the manner in which these goals are pursued have significant impact on that individual's behavior in an organization.A person's behavior in the workplace is, to some degree, determined by cultural norms, and these social factors vary from one culture to another. For example, in some countries it is acceptable and ethical for customs agents to receive gratuities for performing ordinary, legal tasks that are a part of jobs, whereas in other countries these practices would be viewed as unethical and perhaps illegal. The actions and decisions of coworkers is another social factor believed to shape a person's sense of business ethics. For example, if your coworkers make long-distance telephone calls on company time and at company expense, you might view that behavior as acceptable and ethical because everyone does it. Significant others are persons to whom someone is emotionally attached-spouses, friends, and relatives, for instance. Their moral values and attitudes can also affect an employee's perception of what is ethical and unethical in the workplace.Opportunity refers to the amount of freedom an organization gives an employee to behave ethically if he or she makes that choice. In some organizations, certain company policies and procedures reduce the opportunity to be unethical. For example, at some fast-food restaurants, one person takes your order and receives your payment and another person fills the order. This procedure reduces the opportunity to be unethical because the person handling the money is not dispensing the product, and the person giving out the product is not handling the money. The existence of an ethical code and the importance management places on this code are other determinants of opportunity. The degree of enforcement of company policies, procedures, and ethical codes is a major force affecting opportunity. When violations are dealt with consistently and firmly, the opportunity to be unethical is reduced.

About the AuthorJonathon Hardcastle writes articles for http://universeofjobs.com/ - In addition, Jonathon also writes articles for http://theeducationstop.net/ and http://ifinancecentral.com/

Business Excellence: It's in the Eye of the Beholder

At a recent forum the panel discussion was around programs that lead an organization to excellence. The most consistent views seemed to suggest that few programs on their own will achieve excellence. There needs to be an overall strategy moving an organization towards excellence. Nothing occurs overnight and each piece of the puzzle has its own pitfalls.Looking at the Ford Motor Company, as an example. They have implemented almost every business improvement or business excellence strategy possible and they recently posted losses of about $12 BILLION. Clearly, the strategies they have implemented (TQM, TPS, JIT, Lean, Six Sigma, TOC, and probably more) as well as new IT systems that have been installed, have not led to business excellence.I have seen companies get results from each strategy individually but few have had breakthrough results. Each strategy has usually only focused on one aspect of the business, mostly process. Yes, Lean is moving into the office but it is still process. It is now about shuffling paper faster and more efficiently. Big deal. ERP systems moved companies to think in terms of processes and attempted to break functional silos, but ERPs are transactional systems that move companies forward incrementally, by creating piecemeal savings. Yes in a F50 the numbers are large but relatively speaking they are incremental. People in the business require new skill sets and ROIs are hardly ever equal to those planned or projected by the IT departments and consultants! Been there seen that.GE is often mentioned as an outstanding organization. Business owners and managers often mention GEs success and Six Sigma in the same breath. What they fail to realize is Six Sigma was part of an overall plan. Some GE companies only started on their road to excellence and using Six Sigma after many years had been spent re organizing, redesigning, re hiring and focusing the business in minute detail. Six Sigma was not the cause and final end result of their improvement, nor their excellence!Over the past few years I have been working with companies to achieve their strategies. What this has meant is looking at business in a holistic manner and making sure each piece of a strategic plan is budgeted for and is executed to achieve the desired results, or better. Essentially companies realize that no matter what happens in their strategic planning sessions they are not realizing the results they would like to see. Yes, one can just imagine FORD executives saying" OK guys we are going to drop $12 Billion this next year!What this means is companies needs to improve their performance in a multitude of areas. This can be done without a name brand process, or a software package. To reiterate, it is not about ERPs, CRMs, Lean, Six Sigma, TQM, or anything else you can think of. Sure you may add one later but that is not the reason for success, although it probably will assist in reinforcing the changes that are made along the way.The key to excellence in performance is rather simple; It is not easy but it is simple.1. Have a great strategy.2. Surround yourself with people who believe in the strategy.3. Aggressively execute the strategy.4. Measure your results along the way.5. Celebrate your successesThis very simple strategy is often scoffed at as not possibly being able to work. The reasons for chuckles are typically; my business is too complex, we are different, and you dont understand my business, I am sure you have all heard these and more, yet this process has never failed. Its tried and tested. Everything else clouds your vision and makes things seem more complex than they really are.There are, however, any number of small, middle market, and transitional businesses who have grown 3 - 5x their revenue using this very simple strategy. Again, the simplicity should not overshadow the difficulty of actually implementing it. It is tough. People are the issue. Its about challenging paradigms. Moving through false assumptions and mental models which may have become ingrained over many years.So how do you get this right? Get your top team together. For a session with a difference. Develop that strategy that everybody can support from the get-go. Start with assessing and analyzing the things you do well and the things in which you are challenged. Be rigorous and hide nothing. Your failures reversed could just propel you to success. Failures are an indication of trying new things and just not having figured out all the kinks. Develop working guidelines for achieving success when implementing new approaches. Ensure these are in line with your companies values. This step is all too often overlooked and very quickly leads to discontent and resulting failure.Next step is letting each team member developing process based, or even functional based priorities for the year. Present these to the group with the rationale as to their inclusion. Once they are all up there select no more than ten as the major objectives for the organization. This is not as simple as it sounds, mind you. A good facilitator will certainly help.List those top ten objectives. Determine the metrics of success. Define monthly targets. Determine how to get the data in a format to present to your group and the company to show success.This will be the basis of a monthly review. You will be visiting the exceptions in detail and celebrating successes. This will be the cornerstone of achieving strategic success and corporate excellence. Focused monthly review session based on the top ten objectives will place you squarely on the path to success and excellence.Like I said, simple. Not easy.

About the Author Graeme Nichol Arcturus Advisors (http://www.arcturusadvisors.com)works with business leaders and their teams to close the gap between great strategies and mediocre results. (Newsletter arcturusadvisor@aweber.com)